MMarket for ImpactSan Francisco lens →
GEOGRAPHY LENS · 01INDIA · IN

Giving in India,
without guessing.

A donor should be able to ask “what works in India?” without confusing where an organization is based, where a grant is tagged, who benefits, which donation vehicle receives the gift, or whether a published amount is actually available now.

This first lens starts with the evidence the accepted ledgers can support: one current evaluator-backed opportunity that explicitly includes India, plus 50 GiveWell grant records with India in their country field. Everything else remains visibly unassessed.

GiveWell grants naming India50$170.37M in full published row amounts since 2015
Current evaluator opportunities1Explicit India service geography, not a synthetic rank
India-specific funding room0Organization-wide room is not silently allocated to India
Donation vehicles assessed0Registration, deductibility, and local rails remain open diligence
THE GEOGRAPHY CONTRACT

Five fields.
Never one label.

01

Grant geography

Only a source-authored country field can place a grant in this lens. Purpose keywords and recipient names do not.

GiveWell: structured · other grant ledgers: incomplete
02

Service geography

The accepted evaluation must explicitly name India. A headquarters address or global claim is not enough.

1 current accepted opportunity
03

Target population

People, animals, institutions, and places remain separate. This release preserves ACE’s native farmed-shrimp population.

No cross-population conversion
04

Funding room

Organization-wide room cannot be relabeled as India-specific without a program budget, allocation, and counterfactual.

India-specific amount unknown
05

Donation vehicle

Indian registration, foreign-contribution rules, donor-country deductibility, and the receiving entity require legal review.

Not yet assessed

CURRENT EVALUATOR EVIDENCE

One explicit India signal.
No automatic recommendation.

Animal Charity Evaluators currently recommends Shrimp Welfare Project and names India in its service geography. The India program has native modeled metrics; the published funding room remains organization-wide.

01Animal Charity Evaluators2025 cohort
selected technology programs modeled with high uncertainty

Shrimp Welfare Project

Sustainable Shrimp Farmers of India

Read the ACE review ↗
Service geographyCentral and South America, Southeast Asia, and India
Target populationfarmed shrimps
Organization-wide room$750Kannual, 2026–2027 · not allocated to India
India-specific roomNot publishedUnknown is not zero
ACE 20251,000

shrimps helped per USD

Range 7401,481. Point value is ACE's rounded 'over one thousand'; range is preserved exactly.

ACE 2025729

SADs averted per USD

Range 464840. Highly speculative assumptions about suffering averted through sludge removal.

DONATION PATHUnassessed

India vehicle and tax treatment

The accepted data does not establish headquarters, an India-registered receiving entity, local payment rails, or donor-country deductibility.

Decision boundary. Selected programs cover 87% of program spending; SAD values remain highly speculative and version-specific. Organization-wide funding capacity of $3.61M and room of $750K do not establish India-program capacity or marginal impact.

GIVEWELL · PUBLISHED GRANTS

Follow the money.
Keep the denominator.

The flow lens covers source rows, not recommended opportunities. Multi-country grants keep their full published amount because GiveWell’s accepted export does not provide a country allocation.

2024–2026 rows26$61.83M in full published amounts
India-only rows21$48.43M can be summed inside the India-only slice
Multi-country rows5$13.4M retained but not allocated to India
Current Top Charities naming India0Historical grants do not create a current Top Charity recommendation
AMOUNT RULE

Published grant amounts are shown only inside the GiveWell ledger. A multi-country row retains its full source amount because the accepted record does not allocate dollars by country; India-only and multi-country amounts remain separate.

RECENT RECIPIENT GROUPSSorted by full published amounts · not effectiveness
01

Evidence Action

Deworming · Iron · Nutrition · Supplementation

8 grants · latest Oct 2025
$17.94M
India-only $13.57MMulti-country $4.37M
02

Clinton Health Access Initiative, Inc.

Tuberculosis

1 grant · latest Jun 2024
$15.09M
India-only $15.09MMulti-country $0
03

Fortification Foundation

Fortification · Nutrition

1 grant · latest Jan 2026
$10.19M
India-only $10.19MMulti-country $0
04

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Research · Vision

1 grant · latest May 2024
$4.79M
India-only $0Multi-country $4.79M
05

Agency Fund

and child health · Maternal · neonatal · Research

1 grant · latest Jul 2025
$3.89M
India-only $3.89MMulti-country $0
06

University of California, Berkeley

Agriculture · Chlorination · Research · Water

2 grants · latest Mar 2026
$2.19M
India-only $55.61KMulti-country $2.14M
07

Ansh UK

and child health · Maternal · neonatal

1 grant · latest Dec 2024
$1.98M
India-only $1.98MMulti-country $0
08

Coefficient Giving

Education · Research

1 grant · latest Dec 2025
$1.85M
India-only $0Multi-country $1.85M
09

RICE Institute, Inc

and child health · Maternal · neonatal

1 grant · latest Jan 2026
$1.66M
India-only $1.66MMulti-country $0
10

PATH

Fortification · Nutrition · Research

2 grants · latest Dec 2025
$1.01M
India-only $760.43KMulti-country $249.99K
LATEST PUBLISHED ROWS12 shown · decision-date order

COVERAGE MATRIX

What each source
can actually tell us.

A missing structured country field is not a negative finding. It is a boundary on this release: Market for Impact does not search organization names or prose and silently convert those matches into India funding totals.

grant country coverageGiveWell

50 published grant rows explicitly name India; 0 current Top Charity program geographies name India.

Country-tagged grants are historical funding records, not current recommendations or current room for more funding.Inspect source ↗
current recommendation coverageAnimal Charity Evaluators

1 current recommended charity explicitly includes India in its accepted service geography.

Organization-level funding room and capacity are not allocated to the India program in the accepted review.Inspect source ↗
structured country field unavailableCoefficient Giving

2893 accepted rows; grant geography is not-published.

Names, purpose text, and headquarters are not used to infer India activity or India funding totals.Inspect source ↗
structured country field unavailableGiving Green

29 accepted rows; grant geography is not-published.

Names, purpose text, and headquarters are not used to infer India activity or India funding totals.Inspect source ↗
structured country field unavailableRenaissance Philanthropy

28 accepted rows; grant geography is not-published.

Names, purpose text, and headquarters are not used to infer India activity or India funding totals.Inspect source ↗
country field not standardizedFounders Pledge

The accepted research matrix does not expose a standardized service-country field across opportunities.

A cause-area recommendation or benchmark is not labeled India-specific without an accepted country field.Inspect source ↗
NEXT DILIGENCE

Opportunity. Obtain an India-program budget, incremental activity plan, and outcome forecast for the $100K / $1M / $10M cases.

Entity. Verify headquarters, Indian registration, FCRA or other relevant receiving constraints, tax treatment, and donation rails.

Discovery. Add India-native evaluators, locally registered nonprofits, and source-grounded service geographies without importing a platform’s default order as an impact rank.

india-geography-v0.1 · generated Aug 30, 2026 · source-grounded country lens · no cross-publisher total