The Great Divergence

IntroductionKey Insights

The Great Divergence was not one date or one cause. It was a widening set of regional differences in wages, energy prices, land constraints, institutions, imperial resources, and eventually mechanized production.

The five claims begin with comparable urban wage baskets, then test the mechanisms linking those differences to invention, coal, overseas resources, institutions, and timing.

Key Insights on the Great Divergence

01

A worker-price reconstruction places London and Amsterdam far above Beijing before 1800.

Northwestern Europe’s urban wage advantage was visible before factories dominated output

In both halves of the eighteenth century, reconstructed building-laborer earnings in London and Amsterdam bought more than three bare-bones family baskets. Beijing’s estimate remained close to one.

The gap is informative because the method makes cities comparable. It remains a modeled urban-sector comparison, not a complete ranking of European and Chinese living standards.

Urban building laborers · reconstructed subsistence ratios

Northwestern Europe’s urban wage advantage was visible before factories dominated output

one equals a bare-bones family basket
1700–49London · 4.16

Modeled full-year building-laborer family earnings were 4.16 times a bare-bones family basket.

subsistence ratio
1750–99London · 3.51

The London ratio remained well above one in the second half of the century.

subsistence ratio
1700–49Amsterdam · 4.20

Amsterdam’s reconstruction was slightly above London’s in the first half-century.

subsistence ratio
1750–99Amsterdam · 3.77

The Amsterdam ratio also remained above three in the second half-century.

subsistence ratio
1700–99Beijing · 1.25 → 1.04

Beijing’s two half-century estimates sat much closer to the bare-bones threshold.

two reconstructed periods
Methods & sourcesEvidence notes, definitions, and downloads

Evidence standard

The opening comparison reproduces Allen, Murphy, and Schneider’s building-laborer subsistence ratios. A ratio of one means modeled full-time family earnings just covered the authors’ bare-bones family basket.

These are city and occupational reconstructions with assumptions about workdays, family structure, prices, and consumption. They are not GDP, median income, welfare for every worker, or proof of one divergence date.